{
  "schema_version": "1.3",
  "rebuild": "v2",
  "provenance_class": "model_spot",
  "table_size": 6,
  "id": "55-fold-vs-tight-3bet",
  "format": "call_fold",
  "free": true,
  "updated_at": "2026-08-05T00:00:00Z",
  "source": {
    "session_id": "3-betCalls",
    "verdict_audio": "quiz/audio/55-fold-vs-tight-3bet.m4a",
    "lesson_slug": null,
    "solver_node": {
      "tool": "PioSOLVER preflop solution, exported to a Pokercharts HTML index (Firefox); villain's range rebuilt live in HoldEq v1.1.7",
      "file": "file:///C:/Users/Tyler/Dropbox/Poker/Pokercharts150320/src/img/4-CALL3BET/C3betUTG/UTG_6_4x.PNG",
      "node": "Call 3 Bet OOP -> 'vs 6% 4x' — hero opened UTG and faces a 4x 3-bet from a 6% range; hero is OUT of position. Hero's three actions on the chart are RAISE 83.6% (a 4-bet sized at 83.6% of pot) / CALL / FOLD. The chart is a bare 13x13 strategy grid.",
      "video_t": {
        "index_hover": 1077.4,
        "chart_open": 1078.0,
        "chart_unobstructed": 1096.0,
        "villain_range_rebuilt": 1281.0,
        "verdict": 1370.4,
        "typed_conclusion": 1462.0
      },
      "board": null,
      "pot_chips": null,
      "stacks_chips": null,
      "chips_per_bb": null,
      "cell_55": {
        "raise_83_6_pct_of_pot": 0.0,
        "call": 24.733,
        "fold": 75.267,
        "read_at": "frame t=1096.0, chart unobstructed"
      },
      "villain_3bet_range": "TT+, AKo, AKs, AQs, AJs, ATs, KQs, KJs, KTs, QJs, QTs, JTs = 82 combos = 6.18% (HoldEq 'Enter range' dialog reads '6.18 % or 82 combos', frame t=1281)",
      "villain_3bet_size": "4x (index button label 'vs 6% 4x'; filename token _4x)",
      "tyler_typed_conclusion": "'AKo,AKs,JJ+,AQs fold them' (Notepad, frame t=1462)",
      "assumptions": [
        "The chart prints NO pot, NO stacks, NO open size and NO board — verified at t=1096 with the Notepad moved clear. pot_chips / stacks_chips / chips_per_bb are therefore null; nothing on screen supports a chip<->bb conversion.",
        "The felt renders the open at 2.5bb purely to give the 4x 3-bet a scale. Only the RATIO is sourced: 3-bet = 4x the open. 2.5bb -> 10bb preserves it exactly. The absolute bb figures (2.5 / 10 / pot 14.0) are a rendering scale, not node numbers.",
        "No stack_bb is rendered on any seat: a solver node has equal starting stacks and this chart prints none, so any depth figure would be invented biography. The context line deliberately carries no 'BB DEEP'.",
        "Tyler notes at t=1114-1122 (s215-216) that the population he is modelling is $2/$5 rather than $1/$2. This is not a node number and is NOT used for any conversion."
      ],
      "node_ambiguity": "Tyler describes hero's position BOTH ways in this segment. OOP (adopted here) is supported by the index row label 'Call 3 Bet OOP', the filename C3betUTG/UTG_6_4x.PNG, and four spoken statements: s202 t=1057.5 'I don't have it modeled for in position, but I do have it modeled for out of position'; s208 t=1083.2 'I ran a sim where the guy went to [4x] in position' (the 3-bettor is IP); s222 t=1148.5 'Out of position Pio is claiming here'; s238 t=1206.5 'we're out of position, so 6% as out of position player'; and s274 t=1441.2 'we can remodel this with the in-position player and truthfully I need to'. Against that, once, at s259 t=1334 he says '3-bets me and I'm in position' and types the same line into Notepad. The index also carries a SEPARATE 'UTG vs SB 6%' button in the 'Call 3 Bet IP' row, which is the likely referent of that slip. The chart he actually opened is the OOP one."
    }
  },
  "context": "SOLVER CHART \u00b7 UTG OPEN vs A 6% 3-BET AT 4X \u00b7 HERO OUT OF POSITION",
  "hero": {
    "pos": "UTG",
    "cards": [
      "5h",
      "5c"
    ],
    "avatar": "lono_ghoul"
  },
  "seats": [
    {
      "pos": "HJ",
      "avatar": "ghoul_212",
      "folded": true
    },
    {
      "pos": "CO",
      "avatar": "ghoul_1513",
      "villain": true,
      "range_label": "6% 3-BET RANGE"
    },
    {
      "pos": "BTN",
      "avatar": "ghoul_2060",
      "folded": true,
      "button": true
    },
    {
      "pos": "SB",
      "avatar": "ghoul_4870",
      "folded": true
    },
    {
      "pos": "BB",
      "avatar": "ghoul_1477",
      "folded": true
    }
  ],
  "streets": [
    {
      "name": "preflop",
      "actions": [
        {
          "pos": "hero",
          "act": "open",
          "to_bb": 2.5
        },
        {
          "pos": "HJ",
          "act": "fold"
        },
        {
          "pos": "CO",
          "act": "3bet",
          "to_bb": 10
        },
        {
          "pos": "BTN",
          "act": "fold"
        },
        {
          "pos": "SB",
          "act": "fold"
        },
        {
          "pos": "BB",
          "act": "fold"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "prompt": "POCKET FIVES FACING A 6% 3-BET OUT OF POSITION \u2014 CALL OR FOLD?",
  "pot_bb": 14.0,
  "options": [
    {
      "id": "call",
      "label": "CALL"
    },
    {
      "id": "fold",
      "label": "FOLD"
    }
  ],
  "correct": "fold",
  "option_feedback": {
    "call": "Set-mining looks tempting, but out of position against a 6% 3-betting range you realize too little equity for the implied odds to pay \u2014 and Tyler's condition is that they play back reasonably aggressively postflop.",
    "fold": "Correct \u2014 Tyler folds. The chart never 4-bets 55 here; it folds 75.3% and calls 24.7%, and Tyler reads that call branch as the tail of Pio's bluffing region rather than a spot worth entering."
  },
  "verdict_text": "It doesn't seem like a great idea to call your pocket pairs either \u2014 it's not that hard to blow them up, and as long as they're reasonably aggressive postflop you're not going to have a ton of equity realization with the pair of fives. You're probably just better off folding them.",
  "principle": "Out of position vs a 6% 3-betting range you realize too little equity to set-mine \u2014 the chart continues with JJ+/AK/AQs and folds the pocket pairs.",
  "concept": "fold-small-pairs-vs-tight-3bet",
  "concepts_secondary": [],
  "topic": "preflop-architecture",
  "difficulty": 4,
  "pct_provenance": {
    "6": {
      "role": "range_composition",
      "referent": "The 3-betting range assigned to the villain in the sim Tyler opened \u2014 the index button is labelled 'vs 6% 4x' and the file is UTG_6_4x.PNG. Tyler rebuilds it live in HoldEq as TT+, AKo, AKs, AQs, AJs, ATs, KQs, KJs, KTs, QJs, QTs, JTs, and the dialog reads '6.18 % or 82 combos' (82/1326 = 6.18%). This is a sim INPUT, not a measured population figure.",
      "source": "frame t=1077.4 (index button + Firefox status bar) and frame t=1281 (HoldEq 'Enter range' dialog); typed Notepad 'vs 6% You get 3-bet by a nit when you open in and MP and UTG' at frame t=1462"
    },
    "75.3": {
      "role": "grid_cell",
      "referent": "FOLD frequency in the '55' cell of the 13x13 grid at THIS node (UTG_6_4x.PNG, hero OOP facing the 4x 3-bet). Printed as 75.267%. It is the frequency of the FOLD branch for the whole 55 rank-cell (all six combos), not an EV and not a hero equity.",
      "source": "frame t=1096.0, cell '55' \u2014 RAISE 83.6% 0.000% / CALL 24.733% / FOLD 75.267%"
    },
    "24.7": {
      "role": "grid_cell",
      "referent": "CALL frequency in the same '55' cell at the same node. Printed as 24.733%. Quoted so the reveal does not present FOLD as a pure-strategy solver answer \u2014 the chart mixes, and Tyler is exploitatively overriding the call branch.",
      "source": "frame t=1096.0, cell '55' \u2014 CALL 24.733%"
    }
  },
  "size_claims": {
    "4x": {
      "street": "preflop",
      "actor": "CO",
      "meaning": "the 3-bet is 4x the open",
      "sourced": true,
      "source": "index button 'vs 6% 4x' + filename token _4x (frame t=1077.4); spoken s208 t=1083.2 'I ran a sim where the guy went to [4x] in position'"
    },
    "2.5bb open": {
      "street": "preflop",
      "actor": "hero",
      "meaning": "hero's UTG open size as rendered on the felt",
      "sourced": false,
      "source": "NOT on the chart and never spoken. Rendering scale only, chosen so that 4x lands on a round 10bb. See source.solver_node.assumptions."
    },
    "83.6% pot 4-bet": {
      "street": "preflop",
      "actor": "hero",
      "meaning": "the size of the RAISE branch the chart offers hero; 55 takes it 0.000% of the time",
      "sourced": true,
      "source": "chart cell labels 'RAISE 83.6%' (frame t=1096; AA reads RAISE 83.6% 100.000%, confirming 83.6% is the SIZE and the right-hand column the frequency). Recorded for provenance only \u2014 not displayed on the quiz.",
      "displayed": false
    },
    "low": {
      "street": null,
      "actor": null,
      "meaning": "NOT A SIZE CLAIM. The validator's I2 substring scan matches 'low' inside Tyler's phrase 'blow them up' in verdict_text. That phrase is on the tape (s265, t=1370.4) and in the verdict audio this quiz plays, so it is kept verbatim. No bet is being described.",
      "sourced": false,
      "false_positive": true
    }
  },
  "cosmetic_invention": [
    "Hero's suits 5h/5c. The screen object is the rank-level 13x13 cell '55' (all six combos share one cell) and Tyler's language is rank-level throughout ('your pocket pairs', 'the pair of fives'). There is no suit qualifier anywhere in the segment, so any two fives are a faithful member of the analysed object.",
    "The villain's exact seat (CO). The node fixes only that hero opened UTG and is OUT of position, so the 3-bettor is some later seat (MP/CO/BTN). CO is a staging choice; no spoken or displayed fact depends on it.",
    "The four folded seats (HJ, BTN, SB, BB) and their ghoul avatars. A UTG-first skeleton requires nobody to act before hero; the folds behind are the minimum staging needed to bring the action back to hero.",
    "The dealer button placement on the BTN seat. Cosmetic; the chart shows no table."
  ],
  "decision": {
    "pot_settled_bb": 1.5,
    "bets": {
      "hero": 2.5,
      "CO": 10
    }
  }
}