{
  "schema_version": "1.3",
  "table_size": 6,
  "id": "kts-fold-vs-tight-3bet",
  "format": "call_fold",
  "free": true,
  "rebuild": "v2",
  "provenance_class": "dealt_hand",
  "updated_at": "2026-08-08T00:00:00Z",
  "source": {
    "session_id": "3-betCalls",
    "verdict_audio": "quiz/audio/kts-fold-vs-tight-3bet.m4a",
    "lesson_slug": null,
    "master_slug": "3-betCalls_master",
    "master_t": 1935.6,
    "ser_sentences": [240, 249, 283, 284, 377, 383, 384, 385, 386, 392],
    "hand_record": {
      "lane": "FRAME_READ",
      "played": "A real hand reviewed in-session on the PokerTracker replayer ('Playback' window, typed action-log pane, FLOP/TURN/RIVER transport bar), on screen at t=1500 (preflop node) and again at t=2110 (flop node) with the SAME hand number in the title bar both times. The verdict beats (s385-386, t=2064-2083) are spoken over a 40-second PioViewer detour (t~2020-2105) INSIDE that continuous review — Tyler ties the sim back to the hand himself: s283 'so if we roll back to this hand with that extra information', s392 'I'm finding myself really trying hard to convince you to fold this hand'. Frames are READ-ONLY provenance — never aired (the title bar and felt watermark carry poker-room branding). Re-derived from fresh frame samples 2026-08-08.",
      "hand_id": "#4439640849 (7733294), begins 2023/03/20 11:56 pm — begins-line and title bar both crisp at this capture resolution.",
      "stake": {
        "source": "Replayer title bar at t=1500 and t=2110: 'Playback for <room> Hand #4439640849 (7733294) - $2 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem' (the room name is withheld from this fixture per the no-operator-branding policy and recorded only in the audit trail). Log pane states the posts directly: 'posts the small blind 1.00' / 'posts the big blind 2.00', so bb = $2.00 is read off pixels, not assumed.",
        "usd_per_bb": 2.0,
        "note": "$-native replayer; every bb figure in this fixture is $amount / 2.00 under the cited $1/$2 posts. Cross-check: post-call felt 'Pot: $45' = 22.5 bb = 11 + 11 + 0.5 dead SB, internally consistent."
      },
      "frames": [
        "cache/3-betCalls.mp4 t=1500 — preflop node: title bar '$2 NL FAST (6 max)'; hero (right seat) cards T K on red heart backgrounds, heart pips legible at 5x zoom => K♥T♥; P6 (top seat) shown K on club green with club pip + A on spade grey with SPADE pip => A♠K♣; plates: hero $227.13 with $5 chip out, P6 $421.22 with $2 out, P5 $222.61 with $1 out, P1 $212.75, P3 $1,216.09, P4 $245.43 (dealer disc); 'Pot: $8' (5+2+1 mid-preflop)",
        "cache/3-betCalls.mp4 t=2110 — flop node, same hand # in title bar: board 4 7 on club green (club pips) + 6 on spade grey (spade pip) => 4♣7♣6♠; 'Pot: $45'; hero $210.13 (= 227.13 - 17), P6 $401.22 (= 421.22 - 20)",
        "cache/3-betCalls.mp4 t=2070 — verdict-beat context: PioViewer, title 'C:\\Users\\Tyler\\Dropbox\\Poker\\Webinars\\UTGvsBB\\3-betsBBBvsUTG.ctr', node 'r:0:b1200', 'Pot: 1200 250 50 (1500) Starting Stacks:10000', 'IP Decision: LOCKED', tree 'Root / RAISE 1200 (172.7%) / [RAISE 2500 (53.1%) | CALL | FOLD]' — Tyler's node-locked sim of this SPOT-TYPE, the justification for the ruling, not a substitute for the hand. Correspondence to the hand, stated exactly (Stage 5, 2026-08-08 — the earlier note claimed an identity the pixels do not support): at 100 chips/bb the sim's open 250 = 2.5 bb = the hand's $5 ✓ and the dead SB 50 = 0.5 bb = the hand's $1 ✓, but the sim's 3-bet 1200 = 12 bb ≈ $24, ONE BB MORE than this hand's $22 = 11 bb; the sim is filed UTG-vs-BB at 100 bb flat while the hand is HJ-vs-BB at 113.57 bb effective. Same node CLASS (open 2.5, tight BB 3-bet ~11-12 bb, dead SB), not the same numbers — which is why every figure this fixture DISPLAYS is read off the replayer, never off the sim",
        "cache/3-betCalls.mp4 t=1590 — Stage-5 independent identity corroboration at a timestamp cited by NO earlier record: same title bar 'Playback for <room> Hand #4439640849 (7733294) - $2 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem', same log continuation ('… raises to 22.00' / 'Hero calls 17.00' / 'Flop: [4c 7c 6s]' / '… checks'), same plates hero $210.13 / P6 $401.22 — a third sighting of the same hand number with the same amounts"
      ],
      "log_verbatim": [
        "ROOM NAME NOTE: the first log line opens with the poker room's name; it is replaced by <room> here per the no-operator-branding policy. Everything else is transcribed verbatim from crisp log-pane crops sampled 2026-08-08 (t=1500 pane, then the t=2110 pane which scrolls to the continuation).",
        "<room> Hand #4439640849 begins at 2023/03/20 11:56 pm",
        "Seat 4 (P4-6f503472ab6cf425aa49fcf29bbe9993) is the dealer",
        "P5-23d5f620b4f7bef1d09e14b849be8556 posts the small blind 1.00",
        "P6-eb5f868736c7e4147b8649d103863d4d posts the big blind 2.00",
        "P1-00ae4a9c5c06ed7a0ddcf43dce813f43 folds",
        "Hero raises to 5.00",
        "P3-2ab8e622419cdeebd19931d881013d17 folds",
        "P4-6f503472ab6cf425aa49fcf29bbe9993 folds",
        "P5-23d5f620b4f7bef1d09e14b849be8556 folds",
        "P6-eb5f868736c7e4147b8649d103863d4d raises to 22.00",
        "Hero calls 17.00",
        "Flop: [4c 7c 6s]",
        "P6-eb5f868736c7e4147b8649d103863d4d checks"
      ],
      "seat_derivation": "From the log, not assumed: 'Seat 4 (P4-…) is the dealer' => P4 = BTN; P5 posts the $1 SB, P6 posts the $2 BB. Preflop action order is P1, Hero, P3 (then P4, P5) => P1 = UTG, HERO = HJ, P3 = CO. The 3-bettor P6 IS the BIG BLIND; the SB folded and his $1 is dead. Position is spoken and load-bearing: s239 (Eric) 'we open middle position…', s242 (Tyler) 'When you open in MP', and Tyler's sim is filed UTGvsBB with a dead-SB pot structure. The v1 fixture's BTN-vs-SB seating (hero on the button, a SB 'TAG' 3-betting, the BB folding) inverted all of this and is removed.",
      "villain_cards": "P6's hole cards are face-up in the replayer: A♠K♣ (A on the grey spade colour with a legible spade pip, K on the club green with a club pip; calibrated against the board, where 'Flop: [4c 7c 6s]' renders 4/7 green and 6 grey). NOT rendered on the quiz felt — recorded for provenance. Corrects the screening record's A♣K♣ read: the ace is a SPADE, so villain held AK offsuit.",
      "villain_read": "'NIT' is the rendered compression of Tyler's on-tape read on THIS opponent: s249 'Like this guy does three bet, but he doesn't three bet enough'; the word itself is Tyler's for the archetype Eric faces in this pool at this node, s240 'basically you get three bet by a nit'. The measured range-size figures behind the read exist on tape but are edge-gated (rule 7) and deliberately not transcribed into this fixture. The v1 'TAG' label was invented and is removed.",
      "stacks": "Hand-start: hero $232.13 (227.13 plate + 5.00 out, t=1500) = 116.07 bb; P6 $423.22 (421.22 + 2.00 posted) = 211.61 bb. At the decision: hero $227.13 behind = 113.57 bb; P6 $401.22 behind (= 423.22 - 22.00) = 200.61 bb — villain covers. Both reconcile across the street break: t=2110 shows hero $210.13 (= 227.13 - 17.00 call) and P6 $401.22.",
      "result": "Hero CALLED in game ('Hero calls 17.00'; flop [4c 7c 6s] follows). The quiz ends at the decision node and grades FOLD — Tyler's ruling against the line actually taken: s284 'unless this guy's min 3 betting you need to fold' (this 3-bet is 4.4x, not a min-raise), s377 'this is why king-ten suit I think is a better fold right now than is a call', s392 'I'm finding myself really trying hard to convince you to fold this hand', answered by Eric 'I'm convinced… can fold it' (s393-395). No later street of the hand is depicted or narrated.",
      "verdict_screens": "At the verdict beats the shared screen is Tyler's node-locked PioViewer sim (t=2070 frame), not the felt — but the ruling is about the dealt hand under review (s283/s377/s392 above), the replayer returns to the same hand # at t=2110, and every number this fixture DISPLAYS comes from the replayer log/felt pixels, not from the sim grid. The provenance_class stays dealt_hand; the sim is cited as Tyler's supporting evidence only."
    }
  },
  "context": "$1/$2 ONLINE 6-MAX · HJ OPEN vs BIG-BLIND 3-BET · PREFLOP",
  "hero": {
    "pos": "HJ",
    "cards": [
      "Kh",
      "Th"
    ],
    "stack_bb": 113.57,
    "avatar": "lono_ghoul",
    "button": false
  },
  "seats": [
    {
      "pos": "CO",
      "avatar": "ghoul_3201",
      "folded": true
    },
    {
      "pos": "BTN",
      "avatar": "ghoul_4161",
      "folded": true,
      "button": true
    },
    {
      "pos": "SB",
      "avatar": "ghoul_1510",
      "folded": true
    },
    {
      "pos": "BB",
      "avatar": "ghoul_3532",
      "name": "NIT",
      "stack_bb": 200.61,
      "villain": true
    },
    {
      "pos": "UTG",
      "avatar": "ghoul_3820",
      "folded": true
    }
  ],
  "streets": [
    {
      "name": "preflop",
      "actions": [
        {
          "pos": "UTG",
          "act": "fold"
        },
        {
          "pos": "hero",
          "act": "open",
          "to_bb": 2.5
        },
        {
          "pos": "CO",
          "act": "fold"
        },
        {
          "pos": "BTN",
          "act": "fold"
        },
        {
          "pos": "SB",
          "act": "fold"
        },
        {
          "pos": "BB",
          "act": "3bet",
          "to_bb": 11
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "prompt": "K\u2665T\u2665 vs A TIGHT 3-BETTOR \u2014 CALL OR FOLD?",
  "pot_bb": 14,
  "options": [
    {
      "id": "call",
      "label": "CALL"
    },
    {
      "id": "fold",
      "label": "FOLD"
    }
  ],
  "correct": "fold",
  "option_feedback": {
    "call": "This is the line hero took in game — and Tyler spends the review talking him out of it. He node-locked a sim to how this player type actually defends a 3-bet, and calling K-T just loses about 1.5 big blinds against Pio: the over-calls with weakish hands let it barrel you off the hand postflop.",
    "fold": "Correct — unless this guy is min-3-betting, you need to fold. His tight 3-bet range gets over-called postflop, so the solver barrels a lot more aggressively — and once he starts barreling, tens is the first hand with any EV. K-T sits under it."
  },
  "verdict_text": "Because they over-call those regions with weakish hands, the solver can barrel a lot more aggressively \u2014 and once he starts barreling, tens is the first hand with any EV here.",
  "principle": "Vs a tight 3-bettor whose range gets over-called, the solver barrels relentlessly \u2014 suited broadways like K-T can't continue; fold preflop.",
  "concept": "fold-marginal-vs-tight-3bet",
  "concepts_secondary": [],
  "topic": "preflop-architecture",
  "difficulty": 5,
  "aired_transcript": "But it can be a lot more aggressive postflop because all the overcalls with the kind of weakish hands. So the fact that they're overcalling those regions means that the pyro can barrel a lot more aggressively. And once he starts barreling, well, have fun. It's like Tenz is the first hand with any EV on the sim.",
  "aired_transcript_note": "Verbatim small.en re-ASR of the existing quiz/audio/kts-fold-vs-tight-3bet.m4a (19.56s), re-run 2026-08-08. Beats: s385-386 (t=2064.1-2083.4), matching the QUIZ_AUDIO registry. 'the pyro' is the ASR's rendering of 'the Pio'; 'Tenz' = 'tens'. NO RE-CUT NEEDED: the clip names no positions, no sizes and no percentages, so nothing in it contradicts the rebuilt HJ-vs-BB hand — it was always true of this hand. The tape's range-width figures (s285, s388-390) sit OUTSIDE the clip and stay off every surface (rule 7).",
  "pct_provenance": {},
  "size_claims": {
    "_note": "No size adjective appears in any displayed string or in the aired clip. Entries document the real amounts read off the replayer.",
    "open to 2.5": {
      "street": "preflop",
      "actor": "hero (HJ)",
      "to_bb": 2.5,
      "source": "log 'Hero raises to 5.00' at $1/$2; felt $5 chip in front of hero, t=1500"
    },
    "3-bet to 11": {
      "street": "preflop",
      "actor": "BB",
      "to_bb": 11,
      "source": "log 'P6-eb5f8687… raises to 22.00' at $1/$2 (t=2110 pane); a 4.4x 3-bet, not a min-raise — which is exactly the branch of s284 that makes this a fold"
    }
  },
  "claims": [
    {
      "text": "the $-to-bb conversion is 2.00 $/bb",
      "lhs": "big blind in dollars",
      "op": "=",
      "rhs": "$2.00",
      "source": "title bar '$2 NL FAST (6 max)' + log 'posts the small blind 1.00' / 'posts the big blind 2.00', pixels t=1500"
    },
    {
      "text": "the decision price: BB 3-bets to 11 (=$22) over hero's 2.5 (=$5) open with the folded SB's 0.5 dead; hero calls 8.5 to win 14",
      "lhs": "breakeven equity at the node",
      "op": "=",
      "rhs": "8.5 / (14 + 8.5) = 37.8%",
      "source": "log lines t=1500/t=2110; arithmetic recomputed; cross-anchored by the post-call felt 'Pot: $45' = 5+17+22+1 at t=2110"
    },
    {
      "text": "calling K-T 'just loses 1.5 big blinds against PIO' — Tyler's spoken read of his own node-locked sim at THIS decision, cited with its referent",
      "lhs": "EV(call KTs) in Tyler's node-locked Pio sim",
      "op": "\u2248",
      "rhs": "-1.5 bb (his companion figure: a pair of sevens loses 2 bb, s383)",
      "source": "spoken s383, read aloud off the sim on screen at t=2070 ('3-betsBBBvsUTG.ctr', node r:0:b1200, IP LOCKED). CORRECTED at Stage 5 (2026-08-08): this IS a grid readout — the earlier note denied it, which would have skipped exactly the check ruling-2 condition 3 demands. The pixels: the per-combo panel shows K♠T♠ / K♥T♥ / K♦T♦ / K♣T♣ ALL reading 'RAISE 53.1% 563.9 / CALL -145.2 / FOLD 0.0'. At 100 chips/bb that CALL cell is -1.45 bb, which is Tyler's spoken '1.5 big blinds'; companions on the same grid: 77 CALL -226.8 (his spoken 'loses two big blinds') and TT CALL +126.4 (his spoken 'tens is the first hand with any EV'). COMBO INTEGRITY HOLDS: all four suited K-T combos carry the identical figure, so the fixture's K♥T♥ IS one of the combos the number describes — the tt-fold-963 defect (a no-spade CALL cell displayed beside a T♠ holding) cannot occur here. The referent is named in the displayed string ('against Pio') and in the aired clip ('on the sim')"
    },
    {
      "text": "'tens is the first hand with any EV' once the sim barrels — the aired mechanism",
      "lhs": "hand ranking at the sim's call node",
      "op": "per",
      "rhs": "Tyler's node-locked sim, aired with its referent ('on the sim')",
      "source": "spoken s385-386 (the aired clip); s384 'the PIO is still actually three betting about the same range' sets the node"
    },
    {
      "text": "stack chain reconciles across both sampled nodes",
      "lhs": "hero 232.13 - 5 = 227.13; 227.13 - 17 = 210.13; P6 423.22 - 22 = 401.22",
      "op": "=",
      "rhs": "every plate read: 227.13/421.22 (t=1500), 210.13/401.22 (t=2110)",
      "source": "pixels t=1500 and t=2110"
    }
  ],
  "unverifiable_claims": [
    "The 'NIT' / tight-3-bettor read is Tyler's stated on-tape read on this real opponent (s249; archetype word from s240), not a verifiable fact about the account; its measured basis (range-size percentages, s285/s388-390) is population data and is edge-gated out of this fixture entirely (rule 7) — direction only.",
    "The -1.5 bb call EV is Tyler's spoken read of his own node-locked Pio file; the node-lock inputs are his private work, so the figure is asserted only as his in-session number with its referent named, not as a publicly reproducible solve.",
    "SER speaker labels: s393 'No, no you I'm convinced' is tagged tyler/spk_confident but is Eric by content (it answers s392); no ruling fact in this fixture rests on it."
  ],
  "cosmetic_invention": [
    "Ghoul avatars (lono_ghoul hero + ghoul_3201/4161/1510/3532/3820) — art only; the room shows anonymized IDs (P1-00ae…, P3-2ab8…, P4-6f50…, P5-23d5…, P6-eb5f…).",
    "The villain's display name 'NIT' — the rendered label for Tyler's on-tape read (s249 'this guy does three bet, but he doesn't three bet enough'; word from s240 'you get three bet by a nit'); the room shows only the anonymized ID.",
    "Position labels UTG/HJ/CO/BTN/SB/BB — derived from the log ('Seat 4 … is the dealer', posts, action order), not printed on the felt (see seat_derivation).",
    "Stack displays rounded to 0.01 bb from the dollar plates ($227.13 -> 113.57 bb; $401.22 -> 200.61 bb).",
    "NOTHING else is invented: the suits (K\u2665T\u2665), every size, the fold order, the 4.4x 3-bet and the dead SB are the pixels' own. The v1 fixture's BTN-vs-SB seating (hero on the button, a SB 'TAG' 3-betting, the BB folding), K\u2660T\u2660 suits, 97/89 bb stacks and 14.5 bb pot are all removed."
  ],
  "decision": {
    "pot_settled_bb": 0.5,
    "bets": {
      "BB": 11,
      "hero": 2.5
    }
  }
}